SWP’s Marxism 2016. We Publish Some of the ‘List of Shame’.
The List of Shame.
Tariq Ali
Speaks on The American Empire and its Discontents Fri, 4.15pm
Moazzam Begg
CAGE Outreach Director joins our opening rally.
The full list is too long to reproduce but these are particularly worthy of note in view of the post that follows:
Judith Orr
Author of “Marxism and Womens Liberation” on fighting sexism today.
Nahella Ashraf
Panel to discuss fighting sexism and Islamophobia.
Natalie Bennett
Leader of the Green Party debates “Where next after the EU referendum?” with Joseph Choonara.
Maz Saleem
Panel to discuss fighting sexism and Islamophobia
Full list: Marxism 2016.
This is obviously something the above chose to ignore:
Why I don’t buy Socialist Worker
Posted on 22/05/2016 .
In 2010 a man called Martin Smith (“Comrade Delta”) was the National Secretary of the SWP, its day to day leader, the person who employs the other party workers. In July of that year, a 17 year old woman (“Comrade W”) complained that he had mistreated her. She didn’t use the word “rape”, but the people who met her and heard her knew what she was talking about.
From the start, Smith’s supporters (including Weyman Bennett,
(Weyman Bennet. Marxism 2016.
Analyses the state of the Nazis and the far right in Britain)
who worked with him on the SWP’s anti-fascist campaign) put pressure on the women who helped Comrade W, calling one of them a “traitor”, ostracising and dismissing them and forcing them out of the SWP.
The complaint was investigated by Charlie Kimber, who is now the editor of Socialist Worker. He met comrade W, told her that he believed her and that disciplinary action would be taken against Martin Smith. The extent of the punishment was as follows: Smith was demoted from his position as National Secretary but remained in the SWP’s full-time leadership on its Central Committee.
Smith’s demotion was eventually explained to the membership at the SWP’s 2011 conference, where it was introduced by Alex Callinicos who complained about outside forces reporting on internal difficulties within the SWP. He said there was a complaint, he didn’t explain its seriousness and he said that Smith himself had asked to be moved to a different role. The session ended with delegates clapping, stamping their feet in Smith’s defence and shouting, “The workers united will never be defeated.”
….
At the start of 2013, the SWP conference narrowly approved the disputes committee report; from then on large parts of the organisation operated a loyalty test: if you were willing to back Smith, you could remain in the party. if not, you were told to leave. The atmosphere, at its worst, was as hostile as could be. Members of Smith’s personal anti-fascist bodyguard, men in the late 40s, spat in the faces of a woman in her 20s who disagreed with them. Smith’s supporters threatened to beat up another young, male critic. People were silenced, jeered, told to their faces to leave.
The second complaint was eventually heard. It was in writing. It too, has never been published. In careful, painful detail, it described further improper sexual conduct by Smith. This time, and for the first time in the entire scandal, the SWP’s leadership decided that a degree of damage limitation was necessary. A fresh panel was convened and Martin Smith resigned rather than face investigation.
In the SWP, you will be told that Martin Smith was vindicated. He wasn’t. The last panel to investigate his complaint found that there was enough evidence of sexual harassment that if he was to ever seek to rejoin he would have to explain his conduct.
In the SWP, you will be told that the leadership’s critics were a few malcontents, people who were on the verge of leaving the organisation anyway. They weren’t. At least 700 people left, or around a quarter of the SWP’s subs-paying membership. Among those who left were people who had given twenty, thirty, even fifty years of their lives to that organisation.
In the SWP, you will be told that this incident belongs to history, that the SWP has learnt from its mistakes. It hasn’t, the party continues to have to discipline its prominent members for sexual harassment. The men who attempted to cover up a crime are all still in leadership positions.
Another reason not to buy the Socialist Worker is that it is an absolutely dreadful publication…ridiculously over-simplistic, patronising to its audience, factually distorted and written in a weird hectoring style (all thundering imperatives and no persuasion). At least the brilliantly satirical publication, “Workers Hammer,” and the far-left’s answer to Heat, “The Weekly Worker”, raise a few laughs.
Alex Ross
May 22, 2016 at 12:27 pm
Without exception, every one of the speakers at this year’s Marxism are either scumbags (eg T. Ali) or idiots (eg N. Bennett). Serious, principled socialists should have nothing whatsoever to do with the SWP or any of its fronts.
Jim Denham
May 22, 2016 at 5:46 pm
One persons “list of shame” is another persons “heroes of the class struggle”. I would suggest avoiding either ludicrous characterisations and develop a sense of proportion Andrew.
mckee1917
May 22, 2016 at 6:21 pm
Oxbridge Ali is not a scumbag. He’s a Trot, just like Jim Denham.
Trot vs Trot.
I’d be impressed if they invited Galloway and Livingstone to address the masses.
A Trotskyist is just a Stalinist out of power.
Dean
May 22, 2016 at 8:39 pm
4 out of 7 of your ‘list of shame’ are Muslim, albeit Tariq Ali is an atheist.
Are you Islamophobic?
Are you trying to attack Corbyn?
Heroes of Class Struggle
a) George Galloway
b) Ken Livingstone
c) Arthur Scargill
Dean
May 22, 2016 at 8:50 pm
Has a boycott of the SWP been declared? If so, by whom, and to what end? And is anyone observing it? Mind you, I rather think that fewer paper sellers from rival Trotskyite sects outside the sessions of “Marxism” would suit the SWP just fine…
Francis
May 22, 2016 at 9:08 pm
I notice none of you who defend the SWP bother to reply to the accusations the Blog post on Lives Running.
Obviously that is of no concern.
Andrew Coates
May 23, 2016 at 11:15 am
Alex has forgotten the finest publication of all: Workers’ Spatula!
https://workersspatula.wordpress.com/
“Honest, fair, dialectical.”
PW
May 23, 2016 at 2:29 pm
Tariq Ali hasn’t been a Trotskyist for decades. But even when he was, his writings weren’t worth the effort. (Well, maybe he’s a good novelist, I’ve never read his novels.)
jschulman
May 23, 2016 at 8:52 pm
Tariq Ali is a genocide denier. Plus there was his call at a Stop the War demonstration for support for the Russian mass murder in Syria.
‘Who profits? Clearly, not the Syrian regime.
Several weeks ago, two journalists from Le Monde had already discovered chemical weapons. The question is: if they were used, who used them? The Obama administration and its camp followers would like us to believe that Assad permitted UN chemical weapons inspectors into Syria, and then marked their arrival by launching a chemical weapon assault against women and children, about fifteen kilometres away from the hotel where the inspectors were lodged. It simply does not make sense. Who carried out this atrocity?’
[http://notris.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=tariq+ali]
[http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2013/08/28/tariq-ali/on-intervening-in-syria/comment-page-1/]
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ce47MrGUHMY]
Dick Gregory
May 24, 2016 at 8:50 am
In answer to your inane comment that no SWP members had replied to Dave Renton’s blog – how would you know? He moderates the comments and from past experience I know he doesn’t allow his views to be challenged.
Dave R (not Renton)
May 24, 2016 at 9:19 pm