SWP Goes Populist at Annual Conference.
Masses Flock to New SWP Populist Line.
It seems as remote as the fall of Uruk (1750 BCE) but time was when the SWP Annual Conference was of some interest to the rest of the left.
The publication of their ‘secret’ internal bulletins was the occasion for much glee and for outrage at this attack on their inner party ‘democracy’ on the part of SWP members.
Today all we have is this.
The themes of anti-racism and the Stand Up To Racism (SUTR) campaign ran through the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) annual conference last weekend.
We shall resist the temptation to remark that the acronym SUTR (suture?) is unlikely to catch on.
Oh yes we will.
This is the new mass line, as announced by cde Weyman Bennett.
He added that racism can be beaten. “The way the ruling class is using racism comes out of its own weakness,” he argued.
He said the crisis of neoliberalism meant people’s living standards had been attacked—and our rulers have to find others to blame.
Weyman said, “We have SUTR but not as a mass organisation.
“It has to be on the same scale as the Anti Nazi League in the 1970s.”
Protests against Donald Trump on 20 January, a trade union conference on 4 February and mass demonstrations on 18 March can help build it.
What ‘racism’ is, how is related to the non-‘racial’ but very xenophobic wave against ‘foreigners’ that led to Brexit and swoll huge after it, is not defined.
But we learn, “Several Muslim comrades said fighting Islamophobia gave confidence to Muslims.”
Pray, exactly what “fight” is that?
As another cde stated,
Gary from north London spoke about debates in the Black Lives Matter movement, such as the idea that people benefit from white privilege.
Student Antony added, “Identity politics come from a progressive place, but it can be very isolationist. We need to build a movement that can pull away from that.”
Perhaps one might, just possibly, apply this to ‘Muslim’ fights against – undefined – ‘Islamophobia’.
One might examine the issue of Islamism and the genocides carried out by Daesh.
But apparently not,
“Through LGBT+ Against Islamophobia, which we helped launch a few years ago, we put out a statement.
“It argued that Muslims or Islam were not responsible for homophobia or transphobia and we had a good reception at the vigil in Soho.”
This is the centrepiece of the SWP’s strategy,
Amy Leather, joint national secretary of the SWP, introduced a session on building the party. She said, “What we do matters.
“The deep bitterness that exists at the elites can go to the right or the left. We have to intervene to pull that mood to the left.”
We await a Marxist clarification of the term ‘elite’.
Marxist and elite paradigms are normally considered competing theories on social and political change.
‘Elite’ is one of the most pernicious words in ‘populist’ language. It obscures real power, real property, real exploitation, through an attack on the ‘top’ people.
The charge is that ‘cosmopolitan’ , rootless, metropolitan ‘elites’ are ‘out of touch’ with plain folks.
The ‘real’ workers, ‘real’ people are mislead by the internationalist elites.
How this ‘mood’ can be drawn to the left is left undefined, but one way that’s being explored in Europe and Britain, is to support sovereigntism: bringing power under ‘national’ control. This was the view of many of the ‘left’ supporters of voting to leave the EU.
The SWP backed Brexit.
The same Brexit, which, see above, is at the centre of the knot of resentments, and hate that lies at the centre of the very racism that the SWP now puts at the centre of its politics.
It will be interesting to see how this works out.
“We have to maximise the interactions we have with people and take Socialist Worker wherever you go.”
There is perhaps a contradiction between the first part of the sentence (interactions) and the second (taking SW everywhere)….