Stop the War Coalition’s John Rees Links Charlie Hebdo Slaughter to ‘Security Service Behaviour”.
National Stop the War Coalition Officer with Cage Campaign
John Rees was in pensive mood a few days ago.
As I chaired yesterday’s press conference about the revelation that ‘Jihadi John’ was Kuwaiti born West Londoner and college graduate Mohammed Emwasi, I found myself thinking that few other events could as effectively illustrate the gaping chasm between the establishment approach to the war on terror and the facts.
Rees found himself thinking (if that’s the word) about a list of ‘facts’: He was stopped from leaving the country to go and marry his fiancé in Kuwait, he was physically assaulted by police, MI5 tried to turn him into an informant, His fiancé was told by security officers not to marry him as he was a terror suspect, He was never charged and no evidence was ever given for these accusations.is attempts to use the press complaints process and the diplomatic services of the UK government to free himself from what he regarded as ‘imprisonment by the security services’ all ended in failure.
The great Thinker comments,
This case is probably the best documented study we have ever had of why a young, bright man becomes an Islamic State killer. The fact that our own security services and the insane assumptions of the ‘war on terror’ mindset played their part in this transition should be pause for thought.
Ample comments has been made about this, and other remarks from the so-called human rights group Cage, during his contact with the human rights group CAGE between 2010 and 2012.
Yet this remains intriguing – or disgustingly foul:
Moreover, this is now an emerging pattern of security service behaviour: they tried to recruit the killer of Lee Rigby and both Charlie Hebdo killers and the perpetrator of the recent attacks in Denmark were known to the security services.
This should at least raise questions about whether the security services are contributing to the very terror they are supposed to be preventing.
So the deaths of our beloved martyrs at Charlie – no mention of the Hyper-Cacher – raise “questions” about the security services which may have been “contributing “ to them.
The very fact that the ‘security services’ were interested, or even there, seems to be the “evidence”.
It would be interesting to know the source of Rees’s extremely serious allegation.
He does not give one.
It is the first I’ve heard of any parallel between the relations between the relations between the British security services and Mohammed Emwasi and the French security services Chérif and Saïd Kouachi – apart from the fact they were on the ‘radar’ of concern.
Time for Rees to put that Thinking Cap on again……