Richard Seymour Scums out on our beloved Charlie martyrs.
Not content with wanking off on Race Play Seymour now tosses off on our martyrs.
This is the vilest thing I have read in a long time.
No not the Seymour semen in the above.
But his comments on the massacre at Charlie.
However, there is a wider narrative that is emerging in the rush to judgment, as news media attempt to stitch together details — at first entirely circumstantial— into an explanatory story. The assumption is that the killers are members of some sort of Islamist group, possibly linked to Islamic State, and are exacting political retribution for the publication’s regular satirical attacks on Islam by executing its journalists. And about that, I do have something beyond the obvious to say, just as a starting point.
The second is that there is already an enormous pressure, in this context, to defend Charlie Hebdo as a forceful exponent of “Western values,” or in some cases even as a brilliantly radical bastion of left-wing anti-clericalism.
Now, I think there’s a critical difference between solidarity with the journalists who were attacked, refusing to concede anything to the idea that journalists are somehow “legitimate targets,” and solidarity with what is frankly a racist publication.
To my knowledge Seymour is not a Francophone so how he is suddenly an expert on Charlie is beyond explanation.
He is barely an anglophone.
As this ‘sentence’ indicates.
But no, we also shouldn’t line up with the inevitable statist backlash against Muslims, or the ideological charge to defend a fetishized, racialized “secularism,” or concede to the blackmail which forces us into solidarity with a racist institution.
You will pay dearly for these comments Seymour, very dearly.